Dog & Cat Inbreeding Coefficient Calculator

Enter up to 5 generations of ancestors to compute the Wright COI (Coefficient of Inbreeding) — the probability that both gene copies at a locus are identical by descent. All calculation runs in your browser; no pedigree data is uploaded.

100% client-side — pedigree stays on your device

Pedigree Input

Type each ancestor's registered name (or a short nickname). Names must match exactly across sire and dam sides to be recognized as common ancestors. Case-insensitive; blank = unknown.

Subject (Individual being evaluated)
Positions follow the pedigree order: each parent from G2 has a sire (left) and dam (right).

G4 ancestors — 16 positions (each G3 ancestor's sire then dam, in pedigree order).
G5 ancestors — 32 positions. Enter only those relevant to known common ancestors.

Result

Coefficient of Inbreeding (COI)

Common Ancestors

Export Report

Download a PDF pedigree + COI report for your records or to share with a veterinarian or breed club.

How it works

This calculator uses Wright's path coefficient method (Sewall Wright, 1922), the universal standard for computing COI in animal pedigrees. The formula sums contributions over every path that connects the subject's sire and dam through a common ancestor:

FI = ΣA [ Σpaths (½)L1+L2+1 × (1 + FA) ]
FI Inbreeding coefficient of the subject (0–1, shown as %)
A = common ancestor Any ancestor appearing in both the sire's and dam's lineage
L1, L2 Steps from sire → A and dam → A (number of meioses on each chain)
(1 + FA) Correction for the ancestor's own inbreeding; defaults to 1 if unknown

Example: Full-sibling mating (sire and dam share both parents): two common ancestors, each contributes (½)3 = 0.125, total COI = 25%. Half-sibling mating (one shared parent): one common ancestor contributes (½)3 = 12.5%.

Frequently asked questions

What is a "good" or "safe" COI for dogs and cats?
There is no universal threshold, but most geneticists and breed health organizations use these benchmarks as guides: under 6.25% (equivalent to cousins sharing one common grandparent) is generally considered low risk; 6.25–12.5% is moderate and common in many registered breeds; above 12.5% (equivalent to half-sibling or closer matings) carries meaningfully elevated risk of expressing recessive diseases and reduced immune diversity. Some rare or numerically small breeds may accept higher values due to limited gene pools. Always combine COI with health-test results and breed-specific guidance from your kennel or cat fancy club.
How many generations should I include?
A 4-generation pedigree captures roughly 85–90% of the total COI in most breeds; 5 generations catches around 95%. Including more generations increases accuracy but requires more information. If a distant ancestor is unknown, leave that field blank — the calculator treats unknown ancestors as unrelated, which slightly understates the true COI rather than overstating it. For health breeding decisions, filling in as many known ancestors as possible in generations 4 and 5 gives the most reliable result.
Does a higher COI always mean worse health?
Not automatically, but the statistical risk rises. A higher COI increases the probability that both copies of a gene locus are identical by descent — which amplifies the expression of recessive disorders the breed may carry (hip dysplasia, heart defects, immune conditions, etc.) and tends to reduce heterozygosity in immune system genes (MHC/DLA). However, COI is one tool among several: genetic health panels, OFA/PennHIP certifications, and breed-specific DNA tests remain equally important. Some breeders intentionally use line-breeding at moderate COI to fix desirable traits while monitoring health outcomes closely.
My ancestors repeat across many positions — is that correct?
Yes. In line-breeding, a single prominent ancestor (e.g. a famous champion stud) may appear 4, 6, or even 8 times in a 5-generation pedigree. The Wright formula correctly accounts for all independent paths through a repeated ancestor — each occurrence contributes to COI separately. The calculator identifies every position where a name appears, finds every distinct connecting path, and sums their contributions. If you see a name highlighted in yellow across multiple input fields, that individual is driving COI.
Why does this calculator require exact name matching?
The path coefficient method depends on correctly identifying which individuals appear on both the sire's side and the dam's side of the pedigree. The calculator normalises names by trimming spaces and ignoring capitalisation, but it cannot infer that "Ch Buddy v Haus" and "Champion Buddy vom Haus" are the same dog. Use a consistent registered name or a short nickname that you type identically in every position. If you use a breed registry database (AKC, FCI, GCCF, TICA, etc.), copying the exact registered name avoids ambiguity.